Tuesday, August 17, 2010

meaningofhindu

Jai Charwak, Jai Paikupar Lingo, Jai Buddha, Jai Ravan, Jai Ashoka, Jai Harshwardhan, Jai Namdev, Jai Ravidass, Jai Kabir, Jai Chakradhar Swami, Jai tukaram, Jai Gurunanak, Jai Periyar Rammaswami, Jai Iyyothi Dass, Jai Narayana Guru Bapu, Jai Shivaji, Jai Sambhai, Jai Jijamata, Jai Phule, Jai Savitri, Jai Fatima Begum, Jai Farid Baba, Jai Birsa Munda, Jai Zilkari Devi, Jai Raghoji, Jai Bhagat Singh, Jai Punjabrao Deshmukhm, Jai Jogendra Nath, Jai Manguram Mangoluwalia, Jai Kanshiramji, Jai Shahu Maharaj, Jai Ahilybai Holkar, Jai Guru Teg Bahadursingh, Jai Guru Govind Singh, .....................


and Jai Bhim.

Dear Brother and sister ,.

Now get yourself enlightened about the real meaning of HINDU .....................

Brahmins (means the foreigners in India) propogated in India that Hindu word is derived from word Sindhu ................ the fact is that this is biggest lie in the history ......................... Think about the Vedas ............ For time being let us agree that they are the ancient texts of India. ........ We should also agree that they are written around the period of 1200 – 1500 BC ..... This is substantiated by all the historians including Brahmins ........... And it is also established that they are written by the Aryans or Vedic people (we should also agree that it is most foolish idea that the Vedas and all other books like Kuran, Bible etc are dropped from heaven. All of them are written by the human beings only)

... Now Vedas are written in Sanskrit language .... If the invaders could not spell Sa (and they spelled it as Ha) then the Sanskrit language would have been spelled as Hanhankrit, instead of Sanskrit ................... and Somras would have been spelled as Hom -Has ................... Therefore the logic of Sindhu word was spelled as Hindu, is false ...................

This word is not found in any of the so called Hindu literatures like Vedas, Ramayanas (20), Mahabharata, Arnyayake, upnishad, Puranas, Shruti, Sanhitas, Brahmin Grantha......

It is not found in Buddhist literature and Jainist Literature also ...................

But u find Brahmin word and all caste wordslike dhobi, nai, bhangi and all .................... It does mean that Hindu word is derived somewhere else.., bcoz it must have been found at least in Buddhist and Jainsit texts , where brahmin, dhobi, chamar, nai.. all words are found .............

The truth is that Hindu word do not belong to Indian languages ................... It is found in only Arabi, Farsi and Urdu languages.................... All these 3 languages are almost similar in their script and meanings also ..

Purchase the dictionaries and find the meaning of this word ............... The meaning is SLAVE, and a downgraded person .............. HINDU = HIN + DU .................... HIN = NICH and DU =GROUP

When Mogal rulers invaded india @ 630 AD ( from the Afganistan and Pakistan area ) in the last years of Mohammad Paigamber (570 AD to 630 AD)................. they converted Indians (Buddhists) to Islam by force or by lure ................. and remaining were made salves ................. And in the Mogal languages they used Hindu word for the slaves .................. Now u can understand what was the real religion of Pakistanis and Afganistanis and even Jammu-Kashmirites ................. They were all Buddhists .. and even all the Hindus, Muslim and Christians ......

Thus the mogal invaders used the Hindu word to abuse the Indians

And in the course of time such slaves were calling themselves as Hindu .................. The people (Indians =Buddhists) who didnt like Islam or slavery went away into forest .......... and these people are Adivasis. Now u can understand who were the Adivasis in INdia. ..

Previously Brahmins hid their identiy behind the word Arya (Arya is not any community nor invaders. Arya =Nobel person. it is a Magdhi word ....... therefore Buddhism and Jainism used it as ................... Arya Satya, Arya eightfold path .. Arya marg etc)


Another most important fact of the word Hindu is that it was not used by the Brahmins for them............. When first census of India was held in 1840 by Britishers, the Brahmins opposed for their cateforisation as Hindu (as they knew the meaning of Hindu) ...... they called themselves as Brahmin only ................ If u chk the records of Brahmins , you will find that they mentioning as Sarswat Brahmin, Vedanti Brahmin, Chatruvedi Brahmin etc............... But not Hindu ................................... (Now the Brahmins realized that the true meaning is known to many people and the BAMSEF is spread its true meaning everywhere and therefore they have started writing their religion as Hindu)

But we Indian fools called ourselves as Hindu Dhobi, Hindu Adivasi, Hindu Chamar, Hindu Teli, Hindu Kurmi, Hindu bhoomihar ................... Hindu Kutta and Hindu Billii ................

There are more truths .......... it is enough ...

Dr Anand .( earlier Hindu Advasi now adopted our true religion i.e. Buddhism)
Also check my blog ....
And website ............. www.buddhistheritage.net

24 comments:

  1. Tu Kahe aur sab man le aisa hoga kya?
    Aur tu jo kah raha hai vo sach hai kya?
    jabav de varna................tu dar gaya.

    ReplyDelete
  2. बकवास पोस्ट का इससे अच्छा उदाहरण नहीं हो सकता है! It's a meaning less post. इसीलिए किसी ने नहीं पढ़ा होगा और ना ही किसी का comment करने का मन हुआ होगा!

    ReplyDelete
  3. very good..a new view about this word "HINDU"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The man who posted this article is idiot.
      Truth is here : https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/?fref=ts

      Delete
  4. its absolutely true.. those who have objection, should check out the references given in the post i.e. dictionaries of arab and farsi, also should not protest only because the writer is writing against the extremist society..
    VICHARONKA JAWAB WICHAROSE DO..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is liar.
      Truth is here : https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/?fref=ts

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. He is liar. He is from missionary group,
      Truth is here :
      https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/?fref=ts

      Delete
  6. Friends ............

    We should not feel bad about the comment of Brahmin Pathak ..... it was expected. And (what else you can expect from them) ...............

    Actually I didnt read the comments posted by people on this blog till today ..........

    I read the comments today because one of our sister Kranti Chamar (profile name of FB) ... told me that there WERE very abusive and nasty comments posted here in filthy languages ..... I could very well make out that this work must have of Brahmin RSS, VHP or Brahminical people ....

    Any I have full confidence in me that I am stanch follower of Ambedkar and Buddha ..........

    Namo Buddhay ! Jaibhim! Jai Mulniwasi!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kranti told me that she had deleted those filthy comments .............. I told her that she should have retained, because it would have proved the intellectual level of brahmins and brahminical people ................

    Now one more thing I have proved that Hindus were Buddhist only ................

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very logical! Factual! Truly interectual!
    Great education! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  9. very true thanx for sharing with us...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thats the clear history written here. nobody will find gap in this piece.
    The theory of Aryan invasion is made up thing including Sindhus slang Hindu. Great thoughts indeed.
    Thanks for writting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. ur website doesent open www.buddhistheritage.net

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dr.Anand, To say its not God's word (any book) you need to keep proof, without proof we cant blame any thing, hope its not the teachings of Buddhism?

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1. Muhammad (pbuh) never claimed the authorship of the Qur’an

    It is highly abnormal to challenge the testimony of someone who disclaims responsibility for producing a great work, whether literary, scientific or other. Yet this is precisely what orientalists and others, who are suspicious about the origins of the Qur'an, do when they claim that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the author of the Glorious Qur'an.

    Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) never ever claimed responsibility for originating it. He honestly said that it was Allah who revealed this Scripture to him. To think otherwise is illogical because it would mean that he was telling a lie.

    From history we learn that between his youth and the prophetic mission that commenced at the age of 40, he had never been known to lie. He was so well known for his truthfulness, honesty and chastity that he was given the title "Al-Ameen" i.e. "The trust worthy" by friends and foes alike. Then why should he lie at the age of 40 while claiming to be a messenger of God?

    It is interesting to note however, that although many of the Meccan Pagans rejected Islam and regarded the Prophet as a liar, they nevertheless trusted him and deposited their valuables with him for safe-keeping. This is apparent from the fact that when the Prophet decided to leave Makkah to foil an assassination attempt on him, he left the valuables with Hazrat Ali (R.A.) to distribute it to the rightful owners.

    Once when Abu Sufiyan, one of the pagan chiefs of Makkah, went to Emperor Heraclius to ask for his support against the Prophet, on being questioned whether the Prophet had been accused of lying, prior his to claim to be a Prophet or whether he had betrayed his trust, Abu Sufiyan the arch enemy of the Prophet had to answer "No". Thus even his opponents acknowledged his sincerity, truthfulness and honesty.

    What logical reason can a person think of, for Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) to lie while stating that he was a Prophet and not the author of the Qur'an?

    ReplyDelete
  14. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22356306

    ReplyDelete
  15. Shut up liar, are you from missionary group,
    Friends, don't believe this stupid post,

    Truth is here :
    https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/?fref=nf

    ReplyDelete
  16. Shut up liar, are you from missionary group?
    Friends, don't believe this stupid post,

    Truth is here :
    True Meaning of Hindu & Hinduism : https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/?fref=nf

    Truth about Caste System, Difference between ancient Vedic Varn System & Modern Caste System : https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/posts/1613146925601620:0

    Thank you !

    ReplyDelete
  17. Shut up liar, are you from missionary group?
    Friends, don't believe this stupid post,

    Truth is here :
    True Meaning of Hindu & Hinduism : https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/?fref=nf

    Truth about Caste System, Difference between ancient Vedic Varn System & Modern Caste System : https://www.facebook.com/ReturningToHinduism.GharWapsi/posts/1613146925601620:0

    ReplyDelete
  18. The post is absolutely right.i agree with the post.good piece of information.

    ReplyDelete